Peter, That might be a good point: different flows through the program that set different S99MSGLO flags.
Kees. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Randomly disappearing IGD101I messages. >"So, it is DMS or FDR which decide whether to place those IGD* messages or >not." > -- Peter Hunkeler >To be precise: >It is DMS or FDR which decide to allocate the dataset via SMS or not, thereby >causing the IGD message to appear or not. PMFJI, I do not know but I seriously wonder if it is possible for a program to "allocate a data set *not* via SMS". It would bring the whole storage management upside down. Anyway, I just thought I'd mention that a program using dynamic allocation can suppress allocation messages by setting a flag in the SVC99 RB (S99MSGL0). This does not explain why the message would appear for on run of this single job but not in another one. But you mentioned that there slight differences for the data set in question, and that the tool is reacting slightly different. Maybe the S99MSGLO flag is set in some cases but not in others. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
