Isn't that how it has always worked? LA R1,odd_address LH R0,1(,R1)
generates an alignment error. Or is that not what you mean? Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 9:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: ASMA033I Storage alignment for unfavorable for dependent DSECT? I am receiving ASMA033I Storage alignment for @DDNTXTU.S99TUPAR unfavorable where the value of S99TUPAR is 6, but it is a dependent using and the actual offset is at a doubleword boundary. Working as designed?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
