I don't have access to listings right now, but having just done a few routines
that were doing SVC99 and making use of all the DSECTs provided by IBM, I found
that I had to get alignment set up correctly.
So, I would start Text Units on a fullword, so that you have (off the top of my
head):
DS 0A
verb DS H
count DS H
len DS H
parm DS X
And then the parm value would be as long as needed. But, I made sure that the
next text unit started on a full world. I think that will solve your problems.
Sorry, I can't remember the correct names of the IBM DSECTs (and their related
variables) so I could answer you by their names.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
--- [email protected] wrote:
From: Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] ASMA033I Storage alignment for unfavorable for dependent
DSECT?
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:42:16 +0200
I am receiving
ASMA033I Storage alignment for @DDNTXTU.S99TUPAR unfavorable
where the value of S99TUPAR is 6, but it is a dependent using and the actual
offset is at a doubleword boundary.
Working as designed??
--
Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
