IEBUPDTE will update PDS members without changing their VVMM stats in
cols 73-80, if that helps.

On 02/12/2016 17:58, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> I'm a huge fan of both ISPF Stats and the Version/Mod values stored in PDS 
> members columns 73 - 80. Preserving them requires a bit of forethought. When 
> updating a member, it's common practice to create a new or backup member. 
> Unfortunately, the 'simplest' ways are the worst:
> 
> 1. Bad e.g. Edit a new (empty) member, copy all lines from the production 
> version into the empty guy, then save the new version. This technique loses 
> all previous V/M numbers because ISPF starts over for the new member.
> 
> 2. Bad e.g. Edit the current member directly and before making any changes, 
> copy all lines to Create the backup member. This preserves the current V/M 
> numbers but mangles the backup member.
> 
> In order to preserve both Stats and V/M line numbers, you need to take the 
> out-of-line step of copying the current member to either a backup or future 
> name *outside of edit*. You can use Option 3.3 or some other process like 
> StarTool Copy. This is a little more hassle, but the goal is to have 
> backup/future member look exactly like the production member in every way 
> except name. When you edit in updates, ISPF will adjust V/M numbers from the 
> current level forward. Nothing lost.
> 
> Some gotchas. 
> 
> -- Deleted lines disappear without a trace. You have to infer lines missing 
> from one iteration to the next. I.e. no logging.       
> 
> -- ISPF supports Mod numbers from 00 - 99. There is no rollover, and the 
> Version number is never incremented. This is a problem for a long-lived PDS 
> like PARMLIB, which may last for years/decades. Eventually the Version 
> reaches 99 and stays there despite subsequent edits. You can no longer 
> compare versions by line number.
> 
> -- Remember that there are no ISPF stats for a PS dataset. Consider this fact 
> when deciding what kind of file you want to maintain.   
> 
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 626-302-7535 Office
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 6:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: (External):Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Dummy question on ISPF command
> 
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:20:41 -0600, Dyck, Lionel B. wrote:
> 
>> In the normal ISPF Edit (option 2) member list if you use PF10 or PF11 
>> to shift left or right) you will see a display with Size, Init, and Mod 
>> columns. These display, respectively, the current size of the member, 
>> the initial size of the member, and the number of records changed.
>> To get an accurate (non-0) Mod count you must have numbers enabled in 
>> the member.
> 
> In the line number columns 79-80, ISPF Edit stores the Mod number of the 
> change that last modified the line. The " VV MM" column shows the latest Mod 
> number that was used to edit the member. Renumber does not change columns 
> 79-80, but only the actual line number in 73-78. Unnumber, of course removes 
> them and the information is lost.
> 
> The mod count is the count of all lines that contain a value that is not 
> "00". If you want to know how many likes were changed by the last edit 
> session, you can use F ALL "nn" 79, where nn is the value shown in the MM 
> column in the directory listing.
> 
> And none of this is answers the OP's original question, but others have 
> provided answers.
> 
> --
> Tom Marchant
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to