Might employing the GRS enqueue monitor help understand what is going on behind the scenes, and in what order?
On 7 December 2016 at 00:27, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two SPFEDIT enqs required to follow the protocol. The data set > one (without member) is used to serialize during actual I/O. You aren't > seeing that while transferring with FTP, which is why I believe that the > actual I/O is being deferred. > > Kirk Wolf > Dovetailed Technologies > http://dovetail.com > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Paul Gilmartin < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:11:37 -0600, Kirk Wolf wrote: > > > > > >What you are seeing leads me to believe that the data set I/O is *not* > > >occurring while it is being transferred. Otherwise, you should also > see > > >an ENQ on SPFEDIT/DSN (no member), right? > > > > > Can't tell. While creating a member with Edit and another with FTP, > > I see a red SPFEDIT enq on each member and a green SYSDSN DSN. > > > > Can't probe with LMPUT because it requires EXC. I don't care to > > write an Assembler program. Even if I could. > > > > (This red-green stuff has got to be a 508 violation.) > > > > -- gil > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
