I think the strangest thing is somebody is actually using IEBGENER control cards. I did once, 2-3 decades ago, and mainly just to try it, as best as I recall.
And, it's a pretty simple utility, how bad do the control cards *really* need to be documented? sas On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Paul Gilmartin < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > > I have little respect for antiquity as an excuse. When someone tells me, > > "It's > > not better because it's forty years old", my reactioh is often, "You mean > > they > > have had that long in which they could have fixed it, and they haven't!?" > > > > The response to which (I've seen) is "it's not been fixed because not > enough people really care about it to justify spending the money to fix > it.". This is the main reason that I adore open source software. If > IEBGENER were open source, the answer to you would legitimately be: "Well, > if upsets you - fix it your own self!". OCO put the lid on that coffin, > nailed and epoxied it shut. > > > > > > > -- gil > > > > > -- > Heisenberg may have been here. > > http://xkcd.com/1770/ > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- sas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
