On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:01:22 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >> Is that an attempt to use LLILF to do accomplish what LARL does? > >That's not what I am attempting. LARL will not work -- unless I am mistaken
I believe you are mistaken. You may need to use GOFF. >-- if the relationship between the instruction and the target cannot >be known by the assembler. Why do you think that it can't be done with relative instructions if you think it can be handled for immediate instructions? You can't even do what you want to do with LLILF if FOO is in the same CSECT, >The assembler needs to be able to calculate FOO-*, which is not >possible for the assembler if FOO is in another CSECT. True, but the binder can help. >> What do you expect to be in register 2 after the LLILF? > >The absolute, as-loaded address of FOO. Try LARL. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
