> since z/OS 1.7 I write very little assembler anymore, so I may have missed one or two things. <g>
It makes sense for the long displacement relative instructions. What is the likelihood that a displacement > 64k will always be in the same CSECT? Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 9:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when absolute value required On 12/28/2016 8:27 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > > Well, I did learn something. I did not know that relative instructions could > be "relocated" by the binder. Yes, since z/OS 1.7 I believe. We take advantage of that in a few places. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
