I believe so, yes. "Thread" in the UNIXey world = Task or TCB in the z/OSish world (or conceivably SRB, but generally TCB).
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of scott Ford Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 9:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Multi SRB Guys, Then if one was writing a multi-threaded C or C++ application in a MVS address space is it considered TCBs for each thread ? Scott On Thursday, December 29, 2016, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > >:>>can there be multiple SRB's executing :>>the same piece code in > >the same address space ... > >SRBs go to addresses and they do not care about the attributes of the > code. > >CALL doesn't care either. > > Binyamin is of course correct. It is entirely up to the coder to make > sure that the storage containing the code to be executed by the work > unit does not vanish from underneath them (as could happen if it was > placed in task-owned storage and that task was able to terminate > before the SRB terminated). And it is up to the coder to make sure > that the code can handle it. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] <javascript:;> with the message: > INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
