On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:19:38 -0600, Tom Marchant <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:26:51 -0600, Art Gutowski wrote:
>
>>... it probably wouldn't hurt to do a REPORT SYSMODS <1.13 zone>
>>COMPAREDTO(<2.2 zone>) and vice versa.
>
>Is that going to give you any useful information, Art? I believe that it is
>possible to code the ++VER in a PTF so that the same PTF can be applied
>to two different FMIDs, but I can't remember ever seeing it.
>
>Of course, I have been wrong before...
Duh, yes, I meant:
REPORT CROSSZONE
lists conditional requisites that must be installed in certain
zones because of SYSMODs that are installed in other zones.
If memory serves, I did once upon a midnight dreary use multiple ++VER for a
USERMOD. Not quite sure why, but I think it was due to sharing a GLOBAL zone
for multiple releases, and didn't want to have to change USERMOD names nor
REJECT/RECEIVE during parallel testing/deployment. REPORT SYSMODS would be
marginally useful in this specific case.
Also, glad someone else pointed out LARGEDS=ALLOWED. I thought that was a
prereq for MODE=z11, so I neglected to mention it.
Regards,
Art Gutowski
General Motors, LLC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
