Hi Steff, depending on your service level the index is defined in front of the array. Look at this APAR text
Starting with COBOL V5.1, index-names were located in memory immediately following the memory for the associated table, which meant that programs that modify dsta beyond the end of a table could corrupt their associated index-names. PROBLEM CONCLUSION: Index-names for tables defined in WORKING-STORAGE or LOCAL-STORAGE sections have been moved to the top of the associated storage area. HTH Roland -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Steff Gladstone Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Januar 2017 17:51 An: [email protected] Betreff: COBOL5 and ceedump Are there any whizzes out there who specialize in reading and deciphering CEEDUMPs? I have a question for you. In a COBOL5 CEEDUMP, how do I locate the *index* of an array (i.e., an array that is defined with "indexed by") in the dump? Thanks in advance, Steff Gladstone ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
