Hello everyone, Does anyone know if this APAR is available for COBOL 5.2 and if it is available for COBOL 6.1? I mean, would a specific APAR even be need for COBOL 6.1? Or would this APAR (PI65115) be part of the original 6.1 distribution?
Thank you, .......Cameron On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Roland Schiradin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Steff, > > depending on your service level the index is defined in front of the > array. Look at this APAR text > > Starting with COBOL V5.1, index-names were located in memory > immediately following the memory for the associated table, > which meant that programs that modify dsta beyond the end of a > table could corrupt their associated index-names. > > > > PROBLEM CONCLUSION: > Index-names for tables defined in WORKING-STORAGE or > LOCAL-STORAGE sections have been moved to the top of the > associated storage area. > > HTH Roland > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] Im > Auftrag von Steff Gladstone > Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Januar 2017 17:51 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: COBOL5 and ceedump > > Are there any whizzes out there who specialize in reading and deciphering > CEEDUMPs? > I have a question for you. In a COBOL5 CEEDUMP, how do I locate the > *index* of an array (i.e., an array that is defined with "indexed by") in > the dump? > > Thanks in advance, > Steff Gladstone > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
