Frank, All: I am in the same boat, I am trying to do:
1. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Paul Gilmartin < 0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:52:25 +0000, Frank Swarbrick wrote: > > > >Seems to me the only think that Make would be of use for in our > environment would be figuring out which COBOL programs to recompile when a > copybook is changed. > > > Not necessarily in COBOL, but, heck, for that alone it's precious. No > need to > remember whch JCL member to submit or tailor. Just edit one or more > sources; > type "make" (no parameters necessary) and it happens. > > A configuration management system can provide homomorphic source > directories > at various development levels so the same makefile can be used at each. > > You can do wonderful things when you escape the constraint of a one-level > namespace. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN