Frank, All:

I am in the same boat, I am trying to do:

1.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:52:25 +0000, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
> >
> >Seems to me the only think that Make would be of use for in our
> environment would be figuring out which COBOL programs to recompile when a
> copybook is changed.
> >
> Not necessarily in COBOL, but, heck, for that alone it's precious.  No
> need to
> remember whch JCL member to submit or tailor.  Just edit one or more
> sources;
> type "make" (no parameters necessary) and it happens.
>
> A configuration management system can provide homomorphic source
> directories
> at various development levels so the same makefile can be used at each.
>
> You can do wonderful things when you escape the constraint of a one-level
> namespace.
>
> -- gil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to