On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:50:29 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>o It's OK for the replacing string to be the same length as the replaced
>  string, or shorter.
>
>The "shorter" case intrigues me.  Does it shuffle the remaining records in
>the block and write a shorter block?  Is this done by the Rexx function
>library or by QSAM?  And how does it fill in the longer inter-block gap
>without either overwriting the next block or leaving residual data?  Does
>it rewrite all remaining blocks in the track then do a formatting write to
>the end-of-track?
>
On further review:

Ah!  It pads the replacing record with x'40' to the length of the replaced
record, whether RECFM=VB or RECFM=U.

I think that's cheating.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to