NFS seems like a good option if you can deal with connectivity and security issues. Are you running Kerberos enabled NFS over IPSec?
Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Paul Gilmartin < [email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:13:04 -0600, Ray Pearce wrote: > > >We have also been looking at a similar issue here at Macro 4 but with a > slightly different approach for our mainframe development. > >We now use Subversion as our source repository, Eclipse as our IDE and we > utilise Apache Ant and Jenkins for our development and production builds. > >However we do not use USS, we use z/OS for our compiles and assemblies – > and this works for all of our languages; Assembler, Cobol, PL/1, C, REXX, > Java, etc. > >We have the advantage that some of our products already have a z/OS STC > as part of their installation and this STC has APIs allowing us to move the > source from our workstations to z/OS, submit the JCL for the compiles, > assemblies, etc. and capture and return any output and listings etc. > > > We used to do a lot of that. NFS has liberated us from a lot of file > shuffling -- files > appear alike on our desktops and on z/OS. We discarded our STC. ISPF > 3.17 is > your friend. > > >By using z/OS it meant we could reuse all of the build JCL that we > already had in place which was a big help with the transition. > > > I could imagine makefile recipes that (tailor and) submit JCL. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
