> Anyway, if you have to ask whether to use QSAM or BSAM, the answer is always > QSAM. EXACTLY! CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity. -------- Original message --------From: Steve Smith <[email protected]> Date: 2/4/17 9:29 AM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: BSAM vs QSAM I haven't heard of SAME for years, my bet is it was integrated. And why would update have any effect on read-ahead? QSAM fills all the buffers it gets, and keeps them full. It can and does keep track of where you are vs. where it is quite easily.
Anyway, if you have to ask whether to use QSAM or BSAM, the answer is always QSAM. Getting better performance with BSAM requires both unusual requirements, and considerable knowledge and skill; not to mention more time, effort, complexity. sas On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Paul Gilmartin < [email protected]> wrote: > ... > I suspect that if the programmer upens for Update the access method > can't know whether to read-ahead. > > ... > Is this still, as Ed recalls, part of a separately-priced SAMe feature? > > Thanks, > gil > > -- sas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
