[email protected] (Phil Smith) writes:
> Today's random wondering: how many operating systems can folks remember 
> having run on S/360 and descendants? I can think of:
>
> OS/360 (including MFT, MVT, MVS, up thru z/OS, including MSP and VOS3)
> VM (CP/40 up thru z/VM)
> DOS (or did it start as TOS? Not my turf! up thru z/VSE)
> ACP (up thru z/TPF)
> TSS
> MUMPS
> MUSIC
> PICK
> AIX
> Linux, of course
> Solaris, almost
> ORVYL? WYLBUR? I think ORVYL was the OS and WYLBUR was the user
> environment - sort of the CP-CMS or z/OS-TSO relationship, but canna
> remember for sure; someone here will know
> VICOM
>
> What others? No credit for things like DDR or ICKDSF, which, while
> IPLable, aren't really "OSes" in any kind of real sense!

trivia: there is card based BPS for 360 ... and science center used BPS
loader to generate the CP/40 & CP/67 kernel.

Cambridge Science Center thought they would get the IBM responsibility
for dealing with MIT Multics (some of the CTSS/7090 people had gone to
5th flr to do Multics and others went to the science center on the 4th
flr)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#545tech

This CTSS wiki entry has longer list of IBM operating systems (not just
but including 360)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatible_Time-Sharing_System

The TSS group didn't win the Multics bid.  TSS/360 was the official
operating system for virtual memory version of 360/65, the 360/67 and
was sold to a lot of customers. The science center went ahead and did
virtual machine CP/40 for a 360/40 with special hardware modifications
to support virtual memory. Then when standard 360/67 with virtual memory
becomes available, CP/40 morphs into CP/67.

TSS/360 has very difficult time becoming production quality and is
decommitted. Many customers reverted to running 360/67 in 360/65 with
os/360.

Along the way stanford does (virtual memory) ORVYL for 360/67 (& WYLBUR
is text editor)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORVYL_and_WYLBUR
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/explain/manuals/ORVMAN.HTML
https://web.stanford.edu/dept/its/support/wylorv/

Univ. of Michigan does MTS for 360/67.  UM ports MTS to 370 and it is
installed at a number of universities ... and Amdahl installations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Terminal_System
http://archive.michigan-terminal-system.org/

Recent post about AIX, MACH (unix-like from CMU) and LOCUS (unix-like
from UCLA)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017b.html#46 The ICL 2900
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017d.html#41 What are mainframes

Palo Alto ports UCLA LOCUS to 370 and 386 for AIX/370 and AIX/386
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOCUS_(operating_system)

recent posts mentioning the poor MVT storage management is motivation
for moving all of 370 to virtual memory
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017.html#90 The ICL 2900
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017b.html#8 BSAM vs QSAM
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#80 Great mainframe history(?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#81 GREAT presentation on the history of 
the mainframe

trivia: Boeing Huntsville had gotten a smp 2-processor 360/67 to run
with tss/360 2250 cad design applications ... but has to revert to
running as two 360/65s and 2250 cad applications. MVT storage management
problems especially show up with long running applications (one reason
why CICS got all the storage it could at startup and did its own
management) and it caused lots of problem for the 2250 cad programs.
Boeing Hunstville does special modifications to os/360 MVT to support
virtual memory running in 360/67 mode. This doesn't do any paging
... but purely reorganizes memory for contiguous allocation to
compensate for some of the MVT storage management problems.

As undergraduate at the univ. I'm hired fulltime to be responsible
for OS/360 production systems. The univ. library gets ONR
grant to do online catalog. Some of the money goes to 2321 datacell.
The online catalog is also selected as beta test site for the
original CICS product ... and I have to shoot a lot of bugs ... some
past posts
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#cics

Boeing then hires me away to help with the formation of Boeing Computer
Services (consolidate all dataprocessing in independent business unit to
better monetize the investment, including offering services to
non-Boeing entities). The Boeing Huntsville machine is moved to Seattle.

more trivia: CERN does a comparison of VM/CMS and VS2/TSO which is
presented at SHARE. Copies of the comparsion circulated inside of IBM
are stamped "IBM - Confidential Restricted" ... basically on a
need-to-know basis only .... because what CERN found doesn't go along
with the official corporate party line (and tried to minimize the
exposure to IBM employees).

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to