Dear all,

As the STEP value is not an override for the JOB value.  The 90 seconds for
the JOB is cumulative for the entire job run. Though, here this step time
is limit to 80 and if there is a prior step to this one which takes 30
secs, then the step which limited with 80 secs will get only 60 secs as the
entire job run is limited with 90.

This is what i understood.

Best regards,
Suresh

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 4 May 2017 22:56:47 -0500, Joel C. Ewing <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On 05/02/2017 05:15 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
> >> On Wed, 3 May 2017 00:05:31 +0200, R.S. <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The topic was discussed recently, but I haven't found in the listserv
> >>> archives an answer to the following question:
> >>>
> >>> Let's assume
> >>> TIME in JOBCLASS definition is 60
> >>> TIME in JOB statement is 90
> >>> TIME in EXEC statement is 80
> >>> (single step job)
> >>>
> >>> What is effective time limit for the step?
> >>> My understanding: STEP statement overrides jobclass definition, JOB
> >>> definition is ignored in that case.
> >>> So, the answer is 80.
> >>>
> >>> Am I right?
> >>>
> >> Yes, you are correct.    Unlike most JCL keywords, the STEP value is
> not an
> >> override for the JOB value.  The 90 seconds for the JOB is cumulative
> for the
> >> entire time -  but the step limit is 80.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Mark
> >> --
>
>
> >Provided of course that previous steps in the JOB have not already used
> >more than 10 seconds of CPU time.  If that were the case, then the
> >portion of the remaining cumulative time for the job would be less than
> >80 seconds and the remaining job time limit would be reached before the
> >step time limit.
> >    JC Ewing
> >
>
> Yes.  That is why I wanted to point out that the job value is the
> cumulative
> time for all steps.  He did write in his assumptions that this was a single
> step job.  Being pedantic, the step time limit is still 80 regardless,
> which
> was his question.  The question wasn't "will the step abend after 80
> seconds
> of CPU time?".
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
> ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
> mailto:[email protected]
> Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
> Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
*SureshNc*

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to