Will the ESTAE remain active if declared outside of the BAKR/PR pair David from you description it should
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 3:55 AM, David Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > > BAKRs do not create or cancel ESTAEs. > > PRs do automagically cancel all ESTAEs created since the matching BAKR. There > is a bit (in the BAKR's stack entry I think. I forget which and where.) that, > when set on, causes an interrupt to occur when the PR is issued. This is how > z/OS gains control so that it can do the purge of the appropriate SCB[s]. > > I remember how surprised I was to discover this some years ago when I was > writing z/XDC's linkage stack support. > > Dave Cole > ColeSoft Marketing > 414 Third Street, NE > Charlottesville, VA 22902 > EADDRESS: [email protected] > > Home page: www.colesoft.com > LinkedIn: www.xdc.com > Facebook: www.facebook.com/colesoftware > YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/colesoftware > > > > > > > At 6/12/2017 06:24 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote: >> Hi >> >> I thought for the longest time that an ESTAE was associated with a Task. >> Then I saw a thread with Chris Blaicher where the upshot as that a BAKR >> would deactivate it >> >> I did a search on the archives but didn't come up with anything. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
