At 6/13/2017 09:07 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
So PC inst will also un-define an ESTAE

No... Only the PR will "un-define" an ESTAE.

PC is more similar in functionality to a BAKR than to a PR.
Both PCs and BAKRs create stack entries.
Only the PR removes them.

When a PR removes a stack entry, all ESTAE[X] routines that are newer than the stack entry will also be removed.

All ESTAE[X] routines that are older than the stack entry will survive.


Dave Cole
ColeSoft Marketing
414 Third Street, NE
Charlottesville, VA 22902
EADDRESS:    [email protected]

Home page:   www.colesoft.com
LinkedIn:    www.xdc.com
Facebook:    www.facebook.com/colesoftware
YouTube:     www.youtube.com/user/colesoftware

Dave Cole
ColeSoft Marketing
414 Third Street, NE
Charlottesville, VA 22902
EADDRESS:    <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]

Home page:   www.colesoft.com
LinkedIn:    www.xdc.com
Facebook:    www.facebook.com/colesoftware
YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/colesoftware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to