At 6/13/2017 09:07 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
So PC inst will also un-define an ESTAE
No... Only the PR will "un-define" an ESTAE.
PC is more similar in functionality to a BAKR than to a PR.
Both PCs and BAKRs create stack entries.
Only the PR removes them.
When a PR removes a stack entry, all ESTAE[X] routines that are newer
than the stack entry will also be removed.
All ESTAE[X] routines that are older than the stack entry will survive.
Dave Cole
ColeSoft Marketing
414 Third Street, NE
Charlottesville, VA 22902
EADDRESS: [email protected]
Home page: www.colesoft.com
LinkedIn: www.xdc.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/colesoftware
YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/colesoftware
Dave Cole
ColeSoft Marketing
414 Third Street, NE
Charlottesville, VA 22902
EADDRESS: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
Home page: www.colesoft.com
LinkedIn: www.xdc.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/colesoftware
YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/colesoftware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN