> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Paul Gilmartin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:36:25 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: > >> All well and good when the shop standard does not mandate TSO userid as job >> name for *all* non-privileged users, no exceptions allowed. >> >> Some of us do not get to make the rules ourselves, or even have any input on >> what the rules are. >> > http://mistupid.com/people/page058.htm > > My sympathies. (I know; I've posted it before.) > > And one of my employers' user ID standards practically guaranteed that > Cheng K. Fu, of San Diego, would never become an employee. (Real > name; found in a targeted white pages search.)
Gil, We had a fool proof naming standard at one installation. It has been working for 25+ years and not even one word is/was ever said against the standard. I wrote it and it rock solid. Ed > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
