Well for historical (hysterical) reasons, mine need to look more like this:

//GIBNEY   JOB (0495),'GIBNEY',MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
//         MSGCLASS=T,CLASS=S,NOTIFY=GIBNEY   
/*JOBPARM   LINES=999                         
/*BIN ITB2163                                
/*ID GIBNEY                                

Those last on being local control of the banner page :) 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 5:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Sources of message: IKJ56700A ENTER JOBNAME CHARACTER(S)
> -
> 
> Job cards are dead easy to code:
> 
> 
> 
> //MYJOB JOB
> 
> 
> 
> What can be simpler?  I personally add a notify:
> 
> 
> 
> //MYJOB JOB NOTIFY=&SYSUID
> 
> 
> 
> Now if SUB could use, say, the PDS/PDSE member name as the job name and
> add a NOTIFY=&SYSUID then that could be great as well!
> 
> 
> 
> Related question: We don't specify NOTIFY on production JCL because the
> scheduler is not a "user" and doesn't need this anyway.  If we did specify
> NOTIFY, however, would there be a way (other than an assembler exit,
> please!) to suppress it's function for certain users?
> 
> 
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on
> behalf of Wayne Bickerdike <[email protected]>
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:44 PM
> 
> To: [email protected]
> 
> Subject: Re: Sources of message: IKJ56700A ENTER JOBNAME CHARACTER(S)
> -
> 
> 
> 
> I think in my days at IBM we had job name standards that were enforced as
> 
> UID + 1 char.
> 
> 
> 
> This may explain why many times I never bother coding a job card for
> 
> trivial jobs and once the job has run, I perform an SJ command, cut ALL and
> 
> paste ALL back into the JCL library to have a syntactically correct job
> 
> card.
> 
> 
> 
> Lots of people struggle to code a job card and when I say "just delete the
> 
> darn thing and submit", they don't know about the 1 char jobname dodge.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson
> <[email protected]>
> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > I've worked in half a dozen shops but never encountered any onerous
> 
> > jobname restrictions. I suppose if you absolutely had to depend on the
> 
> > OUTPUT command and did not want to customize IKJEFF53, the restriction
> 
> > could be justified in those terms. But spool display tools like the old
> 
> > QUEUE command, SDSF, and EJES make the TSO OUTPUT command absurdly
> archaic.
> 
> >
> 
> > .
> 
> > .
> 
> > J.O.Skip Robinson
> 
> > Southern California Edison Company
> 
> > Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> 
> > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 
> > 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 
> > 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
> 
> > [email protected]
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> 
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On
> 
> > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> 
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 1:11 PM
> 
> > To: [email protected]
> 
> > Subject: (External):Re: Sources of message: IKJ56700A ENTER JOBNAME
> 
> > CHARACTER(S) -
> 
> >
> 
> > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:36:25 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> > >All well and good when the shop standard does not mandate TSO userid
> as
> 
> > job name for *all* non-privileged users, no exceptions allowed.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >Some of us do not get to make the rules ourselves, or even have any input
> 
> > on what the rules are.
> 
> > >
> 
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__mistupid.com_people_page058.htm&d=DwIGaQ&c=C3yme8gMkxg_ihJ
> NXS06ZyWk4EJm8LdrrvxQb-
> Je7sw&r=u9g8rUevBoyCPAdo5sWE9w&m=xN9JXKfCDZQRhsOOtg-
> vhYY_Rp3s1pmILl_qsbO3ZB4&s=-
> Feh3KIVv_Dp8anidwUmEVHth7YO4rZcXE3GqccXb0E&e=
> 
> >
> 
> > My sympathies.  (I know; I've posted it before.)
> 
> >
> 
> > And one of my employers' user ID standards practically guaranteed that
> 
> > Cheng K. Fu, of San Diego, would never become an employee.  (Real name;
> 
> > found in a targeted white pages search.)
> 
> >
> 
> > -- gil
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> 
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Wayne V. Bickerdike
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> 
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> 
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to