On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:52:15 -0400 Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:
:>>>Since LSQA is System Private Storage how come there isn't a TCB :>associated :>>>with it :>>Who said there isn't? :>VSM said so. Because VSMLIST is not examining the correct control blocks, As Jim Mulder stated, " AEs are not processed by VSMLIST.- ". :>LSQA, as shown in the subpool table in the books, has a variant that is :>associated with the current task, one that is associated with the jobstep :>task, and one that is not associated with any task (for example, see :>subpools 253, 254, 255). :>A key reason for the last is so that someone can use LSQA for an SRB that :>is not associated with a TCB, for which you might not want private storage :>obtained by the SRB to be freed just because some task terminates. Seems like a weak reason. Are there other ways SRBs are protected from poor subpool choices? :>I do not know whether the task association for subpools 253 and 254 is :>surfaced by VSMLIST. As Jim Mulder stated, no. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
