The convention for the past 15 years or so has been first two letters of first name and first four letters of last name. So you'd probably be [email protected]. For collisions, I think it goes to three and three, so possibly [email protected]. You could always try to bribe somebody to be [email protected] though. Reminds me of the Heinlein book where there was a character known as "Rudbeck of Rudbeck at Rudbeck". :)
In article <ca+aizz3odwvqjkyygbxfx1lyeq4vcsborvnghlrkqerj-h1...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > I asked the question based on the Auth. Ass. Services Guide... later on, I > looked at the Diagnosis Ref., which says that the 230s are allocated in the > 250s. Ah well, it was only idle curiosity anyway. > If I got a job with SAS, would my email be [email protected]? Or [email protected]? > UGH. Better stay where I'm @. > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Don Poitras <[email protected]> wrote: > > In article <CA+AiZz3LU-+-mJ9ROp7iesLCSDbzr1qdmjJ3e- > > [email protected]> you wrote: > > > In sorting through the Rubik's Cube that is the subpool selection charts, > > > it appears to me that 233-235 are defined exactly the same as 253-255 > > > respectively. Is there some difference I'm missing? > > > sas > > > > If there was a difference, that would be a problem. Since the note for > > all three subpools says they are actually allocated in the corresponding > > subpool. I would guess that there was some historic difference, but not > > any more. -- Don Poitras - SAS Development - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive [email protected] (919) 531-5637 Cary, NC 27513 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
