On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:30:26 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:17:29 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: >> >>No - never. AMASPZAP (IMASPZAP before MVS, i.e. before 1972, and before the >>notion of APF authorization) was always subject to dataset protection (via >>passwords, long before RACF), ... >> >Is AMASPZAP linked AC=1? It would seem that there's no need for that nowadays: >AC=0 with suitable data set and programmer profiles should suffice. Even if what you need to zap is a VTOC? When I retired from IBM that still required AC=1, _and_ appropriate RACF authority. -- Walt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
