On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:22:30 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote: >On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:30:26 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >>Is AMASPZAP linked AC=1? It would seem that there's no need for that >>nowadays: >>AC=0 with suitable data set and programmer profiles should suffice. > >Even if what you need to zap is a VTOC? When I retired from IBM that still >required AC=1, _and_ appropriate RACF authority. > But I thought you have regularly argued for protecting the resources rather than restricting the tools.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
