Then you cannot completely rely on ESTAE(X). I would suggest reading on RESMGR.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 12:59:20 -0400 Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: :>> But why do you want your ESTAE to do when the abend is unrecoverable :> :>Short answer: to free some system-owned ECSA that we allocated. :> :>Charles :> :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On :>Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen :>Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2017 4:43 PM :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: Why would LE not trap? :> :>The trace table in the SYSUDUMP should show if the ESTAE(x) got control. :> :>But why do you want your ESTAE to do when the abend is unrecoverable (such :>as CANCEL/DETACH)? Some failures will not go thru an ESTAE at all. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
