> On Sep 25, 2017, at 11:28 PM, Anthony Thompson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I've worked at a few different shops, and I've seen that SYS2, SYS3, SYS4 HLQ > convention a several times. > > It's a hangover from days of yore, around about the 10th century CE, when > link-listed datasets had to be catalogued in the master catalogue. The > thinking went: since SYS1 files are catalogued in the master catalogue for > IBM datasets, let's create SYSx HLQ's for non-IBM datasets that need to be in > the master catalogue too. Not necessary in these enlightened times of course, > but those original conventions tend to hang around. > > Ant.
Well as I see it by your explanation you make your dataset name choice and put it in the linklst and what happens in the next IPL when DFHSM isn’t up yet to recall the dataset that has been migrated? There are side issues you have to think about like this.There are other issues as well. Ed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
