On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:31:21 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >Does he have a leap seconds issue? STCK needs leap seconds adjustment which I >assume STCKCONV does. > I suspect STCKCONV does not. But Peter Relson insists that whatever STCKCONV does is "common knowledge", so needs no (further) documetation; no mention of time zones nor of leap seconds. It is what it was before 1972; why fix it or even describe it?
> ... Does TIME MIC need that, or will it be redundant? > >In any event you have time zone considerations. Does the OP want UTC or local >time? > >And I can hear @Gil firing up his keyboard right now to say that STCKCONV is >inadequately documented ... > >Wait a minute: > >"MIC returns the time of day since midnight in microseconds. The value is >returned as 8 bytes of information where bit 51 is equivalent to one >microsecond." > Midnight where? >How are you going to get a day and a year out of that? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
