The whole OS uses Dynalloc everywhere 

Sent from my iPhone

Sorry for the autocorrect issues 

> On Dec 21, 2017, at 17:10, Frank Swarbrick <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Doesn't CICS itself primarily use dynamic allocation for most files?
> ________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> Edward Gould <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 11:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Disable DYNALLOC?
> 
>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 7:25 PM, CM Poncelet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>> From a recent thread (rant?) in ASSEMBLER-LIST:
>>> 
>>>   ... Do you stand by "SVC 99 for good measure"? Generally, products
>>>   do not implement it for good reason. Irrelevant in CICS and IMS.
>>>   In batch, it bypasses job scheduler, job restart, violates  production
>>>   control requirements, bypasses JES3 resource management
>>>   and potentially poses a production security risk. TSO has the
>>>   alloc command which can easily be used in clists. It exists
>>>   because of  MVS UNIX.  ...
>>> 
>>> Disregard the anachronism in the last sentence.  If, hypothetically,
>>> DYNALLOC except by initiator is so harmful as to be prohibited in
>>> production jobs, is there any way to do so?  If it were possible,
>>> what would be the collateral damage?  What fraction of production
>>> jobs would work, unmodified, without using DYNALLOC?
>>> 
>>> Are code reviews a better technique?  Other (specify)?
>>> 
>>> — gil
> 
> Gil,
> I won’t go into the details as I am not sure I know all of them. We had a 
> fairly large CICS system of at least 1400 users. One of the illustrious 
> consultants got involved in a data center issue and decided to bypass the DC 
> issue by attaching the OCR document reader from CICS and read the OCR 
> documents directly. We had no real idea that this was going on. This was also 
> during our trials and tribulation with the infamous (to us) enque problem. I 
> get a call saying that CICS is having an issue and that I should investigate. 
> I am sitting at the system console and the operators get a phone call to

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to