FDRMOVE anyone.


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 2:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Accessing 65536 devices

We have device count reduction on our wish list. Unfortunately we know of no 
way to accomplish that without taking (multiple) application outages to 
consolidate data on fewer larger volumes. High impact and high risk with the 
benefit going mainly to infrastructure care-and-feeders. Our stated goal of 
rolling-IPLs whenever possible would be severely compromised. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 2:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: Accessing 65536 devices

On 1/5/2018 3:52 AM, John Eells wrote:
> Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>> We would like to be able to access >65535 device addresses (UCBs) 
>> from a single LPAR via a single IODF. The need is for bringing a new 
>> DASD subsystem online while retaining the old subsystem until all 
>> volumes can be copied across. We currently have spare UCBs available, 
>> but not enough to have all old and new devices online at the same 
>> time. Is this possible?
>
> You can have a maximum of 65,280* devices (not quite 64K) in 
> Subchannel Set 0.  There are some things that can be accessed via 
> other SCSs, but IIRC the exceptions don't allow you to have more than
> 65,280 primary devices online concurrently.  That includes all 
> devices, of course, including networking, tape, consoles, and such.

Skip, you might consider standardizing on larger capacity devices where it 
makes sense to do so. We were *very* constrained on the total number of UCBs we 
could have, based on architectural point-to-point (no switch) FICON limits, and 
so we eliminated ALL of our mod-3 3390s a couple of years ago. We now have only 
mod-9, mod-27 and mod-216 devices. (FWIW, the most popular -- and most numerous 
-- ended up being the mod-27s.)

It's like a breath of fresh air!

--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to