On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:51:55 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >That's a common beginners' mistake. Try putting the label inside a do block >and see what happens. A proper goto would pop what needs to be popped and no >more. See <http://www.rexxla.org/Newsletter/9812safe.html>. > Yes.
There I also read: Continuation REXX allows implicit continuation; a statement is treated as continued if it would otherwise be syntactically invalid. ... ??? Not in any Rexx I know. Is this perhaps a peculiarity of OS/2 Rexx? And C has an improper GOTO. It allows branching into a block. It's implementation dependent whether initializations are performed then. Ugh! _______________________________________ >From: Jack J. Woehr >Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 3:40 PM > >On 1/14/2018 11:35 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> REXX doesn't have a goto > >Sure it does: SIGNAL -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN