>>Why not BLKSIZE=32760? Gil,
Sure he can use Blksize of 32760 which would cover all LRECL of Type V files. I think OP eventually did use LRECL=512,BLKSIZE=32760 Thanks, Kolusu From: Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 01/16/2018 02:29 PM Subject: Re: DFSORT for HTTP logs - RECFM and BLKSiZE? Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:18:06 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >>>>None of these should need JCL specification to read an existing >dataset. > >Probably OP's input file is NOT created on z/OS. So he needs to supply the >DCB parameters to read the dataset. > Likewise if the data set is a UNIX file created on z/OS. On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:40:43 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote: > >OP mentioned his LRECL is 290, so with SDB the optimal blocksize is 27998 >for an lrecl of 290 > I suspect the 290 is a fiction, invented by ISPF. Why not BLKSIZE=32760? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
