On Feb 9, 2018, at 7:16 AM, Richards, Robert B. <[email protected]> wrote: > > At what point or percentage (records written/space used) would it be > advisable to split out 92s, 99s, 120s into their own logstreams? Right now > they are all in Default. A coworker tested turning on 120s in WebSphere for > an hour and then grew it into an estimated 2 million records that would use > 48% of the space after 8 hours. Not sure if that was one WAS server or more, > but that certainly got his attention. > > I realize YMMV, but am canvassing for real world experiences here.
My philosophy in segregating SMF types into their own logstreams is to consider the consumers. So, for example, I have a logstream for all the types that we process for MXG reports, and another for the types used by CR+. (Note that the same record can be written to multiple logstreams.) -- Pew, Curtis G [email protected] ITS Systems/Core/Administrative Services ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
