On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 19:50:25 +0000, scott Ford wrote:
>
>I think its a good idea something like FLOWASM from Ed ...
>
I believe they have different purposes: John asked for a JCL diagrammer;
FLOWASM is a HLASM formatter.

I haven't seen the enthusiasm for an analogous FLOWJCL that I see for
FLOWASM, perhaps because:
o JCL lacks the lexical richness (complexity?) of HLASM.
o Programmers code fewer lines of JCL than of HLASM.

>On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:27 AM Edward Gould wrote:
>
>> > On Mar 29, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
>> >
>> > CA (Computer Associates) still sells JCLFLOW.
>> >
>>  Forget even mentioned it. I had no idea it was a CA product. I apologize
>> to the group.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to