On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Tom Russell <tom_russ...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 00:12:54 +0000 > >From: Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com> > >Subject: Re: Problem with $BUFFER control block > > >I was hopeful that the IEZIOB would include the missing fields. > >Unfortunately it does not. Before opening an SR with IBM, I thought > > I'd give the List one more shot. The $BUFFER macro changed in z/OS 2.2; > > we're jumping from 2.1 to 2.3 using code carried unmodified for decades > (!). > > You would have to add the IEXIOB macro to your test case, but on our 2.2 > system the dsect generated by IEZIOB DSECT=YES has a label of "IOB" and the > code in $BUFFER gets offsets using the label IOBDSECT.... code like " > ORG BUFIOBST+(IOBSEEK-IOBDSECT)+4 Redefine IOB end @Z22LCKP " > > IOBDSECT isn't defined in either IEZIOB or $BUFFER. > But it is defined in $MODULE. > > > > Tom Russell > “Stay calm. Be brave. Wait for the signs” — Jasper FriendlyBear > “… and remember to leave good news alone.” — Gracie HeavyHand > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- We all have skeletons in our closet. Mine are so old, they have osteoporosis. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
