Yes, ISPF has limited (e.g., no named captures) regexen, but lots of REXX code is not intended to run under ISPF.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Mike Schwab <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 12:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Heretic alert: I really detest TSO REXX (the language) z/OS has Regex in ISPF 2.01 https://secure-web.cisco.com/1gd11NXtRpsNGpTEQV0GHccNCniCu4XpHBL76NpmleVI5NU-yDW6SaS43JUJ_u4EL3P_7uelrG2112ssPpg7szKIFpj2dpDqjSH10_1G8TaCwqgz9P2eW4c-il8x5XMWT7MGiP7KVr2391DohQdT-90LQzxAEs8171euUfqv8LNnl18Ic3YQHIbAas7jCaB6UHmC4N5C8OWRz_OYBfoaGHXU1izCVrUgR4prIFhE6gWBxyHY9k49I4Y7tTf2Q_xbgp71k6JCfJqP0mOVcKdYjgJGnQf9g60Ev2BoBbfySzWQotVoXf3NFApAF5ZELooUIP1S7N8j9lat12gWXT9fFKubf14Jwy-3gX10asRYYfatW5dYOhNxKA_1wiPxpyVGeFuiAKb4wHSDKdDJ-1bcuV3YJ58OOozsKBuM0r04--3xJ1Sme9CzlTCBC_6d05mfs/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibm.com%2Fsupport%2Fknowledgecenter%2Fen%2FSSLTBW_2.1.0%2Fcom.ibm.zos.v2r1.f54em00%2Fuseofr1.htm Awk https://secure-web.cisco.com/1fQY98dsOtQ7culCYmjaia00Hrvcabq2S8M4hQqCzZFwhPI5LfDy6IjXE8ADK4ZzQRRqsSTd7YN3qI33RP7d6zYKtisl2PzgimWUK4WdNrHUE_zmowcJx2xzIKRSgzPtUVmfdva1TJG72qZ2hlUjjpRsQvlwKRWcWXqODvT_SdzlIlEqOFnxv3wbRH1Dw1fWpDQ1b4gYh9457QbuO31GeoHnCb5VADph85i_gIZktY0bJ9K0dWHIQfgbx2QLfY0qTEnmi97_F6PTuZWD0wfWR3R3B5KeI8HqtZ3RfWvRornliSDVKzaYHwTnwk89LhrG_ciqP3g983oGZ9I-4rrca-19vWpgYBYXknvJ3AzG16nEBg-XP4YoItIamgiukRB3tLZKITcn6XBRe9j2aNoB8LAbO5CheSTZysNXud1hD3M-Z12Jbe0GOIfB2HVjOIVqQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibm.com%2Fsupport%2Fknowledgecenter%2Fen%2FSSLTBW_2.1.0%2Fcom.ibm.zos.v2r1.bpxa400%2Fbpxug444.htm Shells https://secure-web.cisco.com/1cEMAEZMMuIWhuBuvX3Nt3pp_G3TuqM-dVvN9oT2IDLNx4DG7xIC9UdmK96vhMf_YJXwmBGtBGlfxNDYo-6t8Wfz51TNGE4YKZsCEFiqnFH5S6XyI7Ng2PkzPlUrA2Eyi2dyS2TwTC05ei1q072QqCCezd8B3fUdVJ6ogZZhsEFgUWAMiHoD6GrNgk9zPcYWVNGQLnuMRRfvJpWEnzeLl1R9De52WciYcxU97Qprg6p-c7tfHiN9e_2i3P-PwbHM-tibukl8vdKBeRKAj6Vcz9kfffvnQ13rgvraEWZoPHYtHbAFmJF8FfA9ZXqkKl1264flsPcuNS3-eW2e5P75Y07Ps13kW6n7ICShN65KieGKEa0r9FciwHTpRPz3SdrEWKGZwmxPlgIcOk8HAgXeId6cP_897oaXQ0tJJ_9Oy3Mpe33gVa64gWR2ZD2TMLVIU/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibm.com%2Fsupport%2Fknowledgecenter%2Fen%2FSSLTBW_2.1.0%2Fcom.ibm.zos.v2r1.bpxa500%2Fregexpa.htm On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> wrote: > Gil wrote: > >>I call that weakness a tie with lack of regular expressions. There's a > similar >>bias in the IBM community to consider regexen Bad. > > > > Well, we could have a whole 'nother thread on whether regex are A Good Thing > or not ("now you have two problems" and all that), but actually there was at > least one regex implementation for Rexx, as a function package, so it sort > of winds up being (arguably!) the same point. > > > > David Crayford complained about Rexx being typeless and lacking lexical > scoping. These are considered strengths by some of us. And PROCEDURE gives > you lexical scoping of a sort, no? > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
