This is the same road we traversed a few years back when RECEIVE FROM NETWORK 
stopped working with vanilla FTP. We are not technically capable of running 
FTPS directly from z/OS to IBM because we depend on an appliance (BlueCoat) to 
'punch through' the standard firewall. BlueCoat does not--and I'm told never 
will--support TLS syntax. 

Fortunately HTTPS was made available for RFN, so we've maintained business as 
usual. I see no mention of HTTPS in the current change. This looks like a road 
with No Outlet.  

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Pew, Curtis G
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: File transfer Red Alert

On May 23, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Paul Gilmartin 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Why didn't the supplier, as a courtesy to the customer, deliver the 
> file with the needed extension and save that step?

This is just a guess, but maybe some firewalls or other policy enforcing 
software block .jar files but allow .zip files. If you have a Java VM on your 
system, .jar files contain executable code and in some circumstances might be 
executed inadvertently.


--
Pew, Curtis G
[email protected]
ITS Systems/Core/Administrative Services


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to