On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:51:52 +0000, Allan Staller wrote: >No impact unless you happen to have conflicting symbols. > That shouldn't matter. If CA7 substitutes a symbol, downstream processors will never see it as a symbol. However if CA7 does not perform a substitution it's exposed for SYSSYM substitution.
>-----Original Message----- >From: Beesley, Paul >Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 2:27 AM > >Yes, we've only just turned it on in a couple of test systems. >My concern is what impact it will have on systems where the job scheduler does >its own symbolic substitution (e.g.CA7) and I will follow this thread with >interest -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
