Also note that SDSF for z/OS 2.3 added the following columns on the "AS" 
command display populated by the data in the LDAX :

Priv
PrivUsed
Priv%
EPriv
EPrivUsed
EPriv%


Rob Scott
Rocket Software
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 4:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Userarea and Systemarea crossing.

  In z/OS 2.2 and above, each address space has a new control block in 64-bit 
common storage which can be used to monitor these boundaries - IHALDAX, pointed 
to by ASSBLDAX.

LDAX_LDACRGTP    DS    A           Current high address of PRIVATE
                                   AREA Region

LDAX_LDAERGTP    DS    A           Current high address of EXTENDED
                                   PRIVATE AREA Region

LDAX_CurHighBot  DS    A           < 16M Cur bot Auth area
LDAX_CurEHighBot DS    A           > 16M Cur bot EAuth area




Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test  IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY


IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on
06/08/2018 08:04:30 AM:

> From: "Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: 06/08/2018 11:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Userarea and Systemarea crossing.
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
>
> After some Googling, I found the answer in an MQ Q&A site:
>
> "For the LSQA getmain failure, it is possible that the Extended User
> Region Top for the CHIN job has hit the bottom of Extended LSQA
> because Virtual Storage Manager (VSM) private storage use is high, for
> example Subpool 0 Key 8 (SP0 KEY8) and Subpool 131 Key 8 (SP131
KEY8)."
>
> So the answer is: yes, it applies to private and extended private.
>
> Kees.
>
> From: Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> Sent: 08 June, 2018 11:24
> To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
> Subject: Userarea and Systemarea crossing.
>
> Hello,
>
> When getmaining storage in my address space the user- and system- area
> cannot cross: the highest user area block (getmained from the
> bottom) cannot pass the lowest system area block (getmained from the
> top) and vica versa.
> Is this a rule for both below and above 16 MB? I know it is for <16MB,
> but I cannot find if this is also true for >16MB.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
================================
Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ 
Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323
Contact Customer Support: 
https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport
Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - 
http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences
Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy
================================

This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of 
Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket 
Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to