John McKown wrote:
>> I sense your frustration, sir.
>Oh, I didn't mean to come across as frustrated. I was just wanting to throw a
>"spit ball" into the discussion {grin}. I was going with the PERL motto:
>TMTOWTDI (Tim Toady) -- There is More Than One Way To Do It. Since all the
>other, very good, suggestions were using "legacy" methods, I thought a "spit
>ball" would be fun.
A 'spit ball' is always great fun. In this way you learn how to do a thing in
many good/bad/ugly ways. Just like you say 'many ways to skin a cat'.
(Meowwwww... )
>---- going back into my hole now ----
Don't you have a rock to hide under? ;-D
To Sean, I am still RTFM about that nasty RC(-3). I think it was also mentioned
on IBM-MAIN many years ago....
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
