Poor integration with native MVS is only one of the problems. There are a lot of facilities that most Eunix sites have that are not required for certification, and IBM has not done well by them.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 4:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ICEGENER to the rescue again? On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 19:58:08 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >Well, youngster, Eunix <g> certainly has egregious faults, but it also has its >good points. Alas, IBM took a minimalist approach to porting it to MVS. > I understand CMS integrates OpenExtensions and CMS commands more closely on the command line. I haven't had an opportunity to try it. I suspect il a les défauts de ses qualités. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
