Binyamin The off for +C killed the call as the book says Off for an at in the list kills the remaining Subcommand
> On Jul 2, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If I understand you correctly and you repetitively want this to occur, you > will need: > > AT +8 (AT +C (off +c;call ......;go);go) > > (assuming you want the CALL after the STM) > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 16:07:38 -0400 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > :>Binyamin > :> > :>For example AT +8 (CALL PROGRAM PARM(parms) RETRUN(+C)) > :>If +8 contains a STM r0,r15,saveregs in this scenario the STM is never > :>executed and return to +C > :> > :>If for example at +8 (call program PARAM(parms) Return(+8)) the program is > :>called repeatedly > :> > :>I would like what is +8 to get executed after the call or execute +8 the STM > :>and then called program then go to the NSI > :> > :>Cann't figure out the syntax to make this work > :> > :>Thanks > :> > :>-----Original Message----- > :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > :>Binyamin Dissen > :>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 3:59 PM > :>To: [email protected] > :>Subject: Re: TSO TEST breakpoint subcommand call either looping or not being > :>executed > :> > :>On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:37:34 -0400 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> > :>wrote: > :> > :>:>I have a TSO TEST breakpoint with a call subcommand when I return to the > :>:>offset of the breakpoint the program loops over and over again. When I > :>:>return to the NSI the instruction where the breakpoint is doesn't get > :>:>executed > :> > :>I do not understand your scenario. > :> > :>You are setting a breakpoint and at the breakpoint you issue the CALL > :>subcommand? > :> > :>What OPCODE are you breakpointing on? > :> > :>What is the exact CALL command used? > > -- > Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> > http://www.dissensoftware.com > > Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel > > > Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, > you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. > > I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, > especially those from irresponsible companies. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
