True. Never have used a CALL in a breakpoint and OFF was always the last in the list.
To do what you want is to have a piece of code that will not be re executed (such as the entry logic and you will need multiple breakpoints). at BKP1 (call whatever return(BKP2)) at BKP2 (off BKP1;go BKP1) If you want this repeated you will need to reissue the at BKP1 (even as part of the list for BKP2) However, my point still stands. Show the exact commands you used and the results. Makes it a lot easier for people helping you. On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:23:37 -0400 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote: :>Binyamin :> :>This is from 1.9 book I don't think things have changed :> :> "Note: If an OFF subcommand in the list removes the breakpoint for which a :>list is specified, all remaining subcommands in that list are ignored". :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of :>Binyamin Dissen :>Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 12:13 PM :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: TSO TEST breakpoint subcommand call either looping or not being :>executed :> :>That has not been my experience. Doing OFF in the breakpoint does not cause :>an automatic GO :> :>My guess is that you did not form the statement correctly or that it is :>possible to get to +C without going thru +8. :> :>It is always best to show your commands and the responses, rather than :>telling us what you thought you did. :> :>On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:49:10 -0400 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> :>wrote: :> :>:>Binyamin :>:> :>:>The off for +C killed the call as the book says :>Off for an at in the :>list kills the remaining :>Subcommand :> :> :> :>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 4:31 :>PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> wrote: :>:>> :>:>> If I understand you correctly and you repetitively want this to occur, :>you :>> will need: :>:>> :>:>> AT +8 (AT +C (off +c;call ......;go);go) :>> :>> (assuming you want the :>CALL after the STM) :>> :>> :>> On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 16:07:38 -0400 Joseph :>Reichman <[email protected]> :>> wrote: :>:>> :>:>> :>Binyamin :>:>> :> :>:>> :>For example AT +8 (CALL PROGRAM PARM(parms) RETRUN(+C)) :>> :>If +8 :>contains a STM r0,r15,saveregs in this scenario the STM is never :>> :>:>executed and return to +C :>> :> :>> :>If for example at +8 (call program :>PARAM(parms) Return(+8)) the program is :>> :>called repeatedly :>> :> :>> :>:>I would like what is +8 to get executed after the call or execute +8 the :>STM :>> :>and then called program then go to the NSI :>> :> :>> :>Cann't :>figure out the syntax to make this work :>> :> :>:>> :>Thanks :>:>> :> :>:>> :>-----Original Message----- :>:>> :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On :>Behalf Of :>> :>Binyamin Dissen :>> :>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 3:59 PM :>> :>:>To: [email protected] :>> :>Subject: Re: TSO TEST breakpoint :>subcommand call either looping or not being :>> :>executed :>> :> :>> :>On :>Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:37:34 -0400 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> :>> :>:>wrote: :>:>> :> :>:>> :>:>I have a TSO TEST breakpoint with a call subcommand when I return to :>the :>> :>:>offset of the breakpoint the program loops over and over again. :>When I :>> :>:>return to the NSI the instruction where the breakpoint is :>doesn't get :>> :>:>executed :>> :> :>> :>I do not understand your scenario. :>:>> :> :>:>> :>You are setting a breakpoint and at the breakpoint you issue the CALL :>:>> :>subcommand? :>:>> :> :>:>> :>What OPCODE are you breakpointing on? :>:>> :> :>:>> :>What is the exact CALL command used? :>:>> :>:>> -- :>:>> Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> :>> :>http://www.dissensoftware.com :>> :>> Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill :>- Israel :>> :>> :>> Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a :>response from me, :>> you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. :>:>> :>:>> I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, :>> :>especially those from irresponsible companies. :>:>> :>:>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- :>:>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, :>> send :>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN :> :>:>---------------------------------------------------------------------- :>:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, :>send :>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
