[Default] On 5 Jul 2018 07:47:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [email protected] (Dana Mitchell) wrote:
>I spend more time now days supporting a handful of IBM i LPARs than our z/OS >systems. There are definitely some frustrating facets of the IBM i world. >For instance, the 5250 emulation is almost all 24x80, with just a few panels >that actually utilize 27x132, and thats it! Many new functions are >implemented in the web interface only but not all, so you still need to use >them both. For batch processes how does the i series command language compare to JCL. How are competing requests for file access handled? Clark Morris > >Dana > >On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 08:07:18 -0500, John McKown <[email protected]> >wrote: >> >>?A few years ago, the IBMi was under consideration to replace our, very >>old, IBMz. I got some documentation on it. I was _extremely_ impressed. >>Now, for a "hard coded" system _programmer_, it is death. Because there >>simply is not much to do. > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
