[Default] On 5 Jul 2018 13:37:11 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[email protected] (Wayne Bickerdike) wrote:

>DEC completely forgotten?
>
>I once read that HP was a printer company masquerading as a computer
>company.

The Tandem series successors are now on Intel Xeon or Itanium chips
depending on the line and with HPE as of today, July 5, 2018.  There
is a COBOL 85 standard compiler for it and the manual is online.  I'm
surprised that HPE/non-stop hasn't gotten a larger market share.

Clark Morris
>
>At least IBM have stuck with the mainframe. HP have buried their
>technological history.
>
>On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In the beginning was Compaq, and HP was know for its excellent printers.
>> Then the printers went downhill and there was Hewlett PacPaq, although not
>> by that name. Wheile HP borged EDS, Dell borged Perot Systems. Oh, and TI
>> was somewhere in that saga. And oscilloscopes.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf
>> of Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 5:56 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: SUSE splits from Microfocus
>>
>> OK, kids, pay attention, because this will be on the exam.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the beginning, there was Hewlett-Packard, or HP. And HP was formless and
>> huge, and darkness was upon the stock.
>>
>>
>>
>> And the Board made a decision: split the company! And thus was born Hewlett
>> Packard Enterprise (HPE)-no hyphen, and please don't call us "HP
>> Enterprise", not sure why, even though some of the internal URLs were at
>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1ILmwkIn_TwKCIxaQtUmzZ7IJH8TTE_
>> ZSP68ucM0phj8KaK4Fa33HWMBdfoeWOc57A98jvHuZtPDQ7GnApLEKogJr6RIDXQO_
>> XH71WF4cWNpE1c81gYGTRQ54LYb47oOQGJKjhb4Q9oJAUZQcy8xKfklRxs3Hn_
>> vF3aSW26Kv4nPvFLO6TwpN8jipYLSKUHA9BKQMRZgpsOC53R219Y9Yv1aOdK
>> z6F79hro7CjLt2xgR7D_5GOXesdNrebJqWdWZEPRwlF6zmtAcM9XPtTdOMXy0mGk-
>> VKH1w3Uu0iLxagCjloNuR8jA9Q2xEV2KdmVRlHERbCReSSrwRvC8ZkjC_WTNKI9oAC08fWlPy_
>> t4NwoaA4Y0UiZkYOPcw3AjiAyw4/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hpenterprise.com <
>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1ILmwkIn_TwKCIxaQtUmzZ7IJH8TTE_
>> ZSP68ucM0phj8KaK4Fa33HWMBdfoeWOc57A98jvHuZtPDQ7GnApLEKogJr6RIDXQO_
>> XH71WF4cWNpE1c81gYGTRQ54LYb47oOQGJKjhb4Q9oJAUZQcy8xKfklRxs3Hn_
>> vF3aSW26Kv4nPvFLO6TwpN8jipYLSKUHA9BKQMRZgpsOC53R219Y9Yv1aOdK
>> z6F79hro7CjLt2xgR7D_5GOXesdNrebJqWdWZEPRwlF6zmtAcM9XPtTdOMXy0mGk-
>> VKH1w3Uu0iLxagCjloNuR8jA9Q2xEV2KdmVRlHERbCReSSrwRvC8ZkjC_WTNKI9oAC08fWlPy_
>> t4NwoaA4Y0UiZkYOPcw3AjiAyw4/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hpenterprise.com> . HP
>> remained, as "HP
>> Inc." (HPQ), selling the consumer stuff: laptops, desktops, printers. HPE
>> took the "S" stuff: Servers, Services, and Software.
>>
>>
>>
>> A few months after the split, HPE announced that they were doing a
>> "spin/merge": the Services were going to be split off and merging with what
>> was left of CSC, forming a new entity called DXC.
>>
>>
>>
>> And a while after that, HPE announced that they were selling another "S":
>> the Software was being sold off to Micro Focus.
>>
>>
>>
>> So some folks went: HP==>HPE==>DXC; some went HP==>HPE==>Micro Focus; some
>> went just HP==>HPE; and some even stayed as HP the whole time.
>>
>>
>>
>> Employee counts are maybe interesting-these are numbers I've seen, don't
>> blame me if they're wrong:
>>
>> HP originally: 300,000
>>
>> HPE originally, after the split: 70,000
>>
>> HPE without Services: 11,000
>>
>> DXC: 170,500 (that "500" is oddly precise; with 170K, you'd think it would
>> fluctuate that much on a monthly/weekly/daily basis)
>>
>> But HP now: 50,000 (a lot are missing, eh?)
>>
>> Micro Focus now: 15,000 (including SUSE and HPE)
>>
>>
>>
>> If you've been confused by all this, don't feel badly-the bloody trade
>> press
>> can't keep it straight, and that's their job! I've seen references to Meg
>> Whitman as being "CEO of HP" within the last couple of months, and yes, she
>> went to HPE. Like, two years ago. So there's no excuse for (them) getting
>> that wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thus endeth the lesson.
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to