> (In case you have some sort of irrational attachment to FB.) I have an irrational attachment to providing library concatenations that will work. Concatenating LRECL 80 and LRECL 255 REXX libraries will not work.
Are you proposing that the installation convert the IBM libraries to FB with a larger LRECL? If so, how is that better than converting them to VB? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 5:56:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SYSREXX PDS size On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 19:34:48 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >It's more than a custom; FB80 doesn't allow long lines. > True. But FB needn't be 80. In fact, FB supports records with 8 more data bytes than the maximum supported by VB. (In case you have some sort of irrational attachment to FB.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
