Yeah, no. Very little in Rexx syntax is like C IMHO. I mean, both have variables and keywords and semicolons, but that's about it.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:51 PM scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe you should read about Mike who wrote rexx, which I have used since > 1984... > It’s the structure > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:31 PM zMan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Semicolons?😀 > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:48 PM Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > REXX is lot like C? I can't think of anything they have in common > beyond > > > the minimum basics of any procedural language. > > > > > > sas > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:43 PM scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > APL sounds painful unless your into pain. I learned Rexx after > > Assembler, > > > > Cobol and PL/1. > > > > I always thought PL/1 was clever with the “dos” then I learned rexx > > which > > > > is a lot like C .. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Scott > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > -- > > zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > -- > Scott Ford > IDMWORKS > z/OS Development > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
