VM CLIST?! ... No! ... EXEC and EXEC2

On 2019-01-11 07:56, scott Ford wrote:
> You can argue anything is or isn’t , I think what matters is ease of usage
> , platform interchangeability , I.E., Linux and windows for Oorexx.
> The advent of rexx, I started on VM/SP 3 , I think, was a huge improvement
> over the old VM clist language. The old clist to me being more
> clunky . Rexx was easy to learn and have up and running  . This was a g pus
> at least for me.
>
> The PL/1 likeness is the “ if then do” , I wrote a bunch of PL/1 on
> OS/VS2/HASP,  back to n the dark ages.
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:18 PM David Crayford <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2019 10:27 am, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>> Semicolons, yes, but:
>>>       do     <=> {
>>>       end    <=> }
>>>       switch <=> SELECT
>>>       ...
>>> I think Rexx got much of its lexical flavor from PL/I.  But that's easy
>> for
>>> me to say becase I don't know PL/I.
>>   From Wiki "Rexx was also intended by its creator to be a simplified and
>> easier to learn version of the PL/I 
>> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPL%2FI&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C600d104804c44aeef7e808d677c43c86%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636828082079095428&amp;sdata=1NmMi1krkxKpBUpr7m9vhfoVhGh5xHTrcfrnJdxUI9Y%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>> programming language"
>>
>> I agree with Steve. There is very little similarity between REXX and C.
>> A case in point would be short circuit evaluation which is fundamental
>> to C and
>> sadly lacking in REXX. There are some similarities between a language
>> like JavaScript and C because of the lineage of most curly bracket
>> languages.
>>
>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:48 PM Steve Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> REXX is lot like C?  I can't think of anything they have in common
>> beyond
>>>>> the minimum basics of any procedural language.
>>> Bless Rexx for making ';' and newline very nearly interchangeable, in
>> contrast
>>> to POSIX Shell script, where they aren't.
>>>
>>> -- gil
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to