On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 13:35, Jim Mulder <[email protected]> wrote: > > IPCS ACTIVE will work with other address spaces and system key fetch > protected storage if the user of IPCS has been granted access to the > facility classes.
How does it behave if the target address space is swapped out? (Could this be the problem the OP is now experiencing after having set up the RACF authorization?) Surely IPCS won't swap the address space in just for this...? > I did a considerable amount of work in z/OS 2.3 to improve the > performance of IPCS ACTIVE's handling of unallocated storage ranges. I think there must've been work done even earlier; some releases ago ACTIVE performance was appalling, but it's been generally fine in recent years. > I also allowed additional subcommands and Verbexits to function > in the ACTIVE environment in 2.3, and more in the next release. I am intrigued that subcommands/Verbexits need to know anything about this aspect of the IPCS environment. How do those that (still) don't work tend to fail? Thanks very much for doing this work. I don't remember it being advertised. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
